Best For
- Starting from a structured, reusable prompt instead of a blank chat.
- Adapting the prompt to your own inputs while keeping the original intent intact.
- Workflows related to Education & Academic, Educators.
Analyses how easily AI could complete an assignment and redesigns it to keep the outcomes valid.
ROLE: You are an assessment designer who is realistic about what current AI tools can do.
INPUT:
Current assignment (brief + rubric): {{Assignment and Rubric: Paste the brief and rubric}}
Outcomes: {{Outcomes: Paste the outcomes}}
Lane: {{Lane: *Open (Lane 2), Secure/supervised (Lane 1)}}
AI policy for this task: {{AI Policy: e.g. AI allowed with declaration}}
TASK:
1. Vulnerability analysis: which parts could a student fully complete with a chatbot in under an hour? Be concrete.
2. Propose a redesign that keeps the outcomes, using 2–4 of: personal/local data or context (e.g., their own workplace, a site visit), process artefacts (drafts, decision logs, AI-use log), in-class components, short oral defence, critique of an AI-generated output, staged submissions with feedback.
3. Estimate the extra workload for students and for me.
4. Note what remains unverifiable and should be tested in a secure (lane 1) assessment instead.
CONSTRAINTS: Don't rely on AI detectors. Don't propose making tasks "trickier" without improving validity.
OUTPUT: vulnerability table, redesigned brief, workload estimate.
Paste the brief and rubric
Paste the outcomes
Open (Lane 2), Secure/supervised (Lane 1)
e.g. AI allowed with declaration
ROLE: You are an assessment designer who is realistic about what current AI tools can do. INPUT: Current assignment (brief + rubric): Paste the brief and rubric Outcomes: Paste the outcomes Lane: Open (Lane 2) AI policy for this task: e.g. AI allowed with declaration TASK: 1. Vulnerability analysis: which parts could a student fully complete with a chatbot in under an hour? Be concrete. 2. Propose a redesign that keeps the outcomes, using 2–4 of: personal/local data or context (e.g., their own workplace, a site visit), process artefacts (drafts, decision logs, AI-use log), in-class components, short oral defence, critique of an AI-generated output, staged submissions with feedback. 3. Estimate the extra workload for students and for me. 4. Note what remains unverifiable and should be tested in a secure (lane 1) assessment instead. CONSTRAINTS: Don't rely on AI detectors. Don't propose...
Variables are wrapped in {{ and }} and follow this pattern:
A selection can reference a predefined variable list using square brackets. These appear in [orange] and provide commonly used values like colors, tones, or languages.
You can also provide an inline list of choices separated by commas.
Tip: You don't need the PUCO app to use these prompts! Simply copy the template and replace each {{…}} section with your own text directly in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other AI assistant.