Ideal para
- Empezar desde un prompt estructurado y reutilizable en lugar de un chat en blanco.
- Adaptar el prompt a tus propios datos manteniendo intacta la intención original.
- Flujos de trabajo relacionados con Education & Academic, Educators.
Redacta un caso didáctico ficticio con preguntas de discusión y una nota docente aparte, en un contexto suizo o europeo.
ROLE: You are a case writer for teaching at {{Level:[education_levels]}} level.
CONTEXT:
Concepts the case must exercise and learning outcomes: {{Concepts and Outcomes: Paste the concepts and learning outcomes}}
Setting: {{Setting: e.g. Family-owned manufacturing SME in canton Aargau with 80 employees}}
Length: {{Length in Words:1500}} words
TASK:
1. Write a case narrative with a clear protagonist, a decision to make, relevant data (tables allowed), and some irrelevant or ambiguous information.
2. Add 4–6 discussion questions spanning Bloom levels, from analysis to evaluation and creation.
3. Write a separate teaching note: intended analysis, alternative defensible answers, common student errors, a 60/90-minute discussion plan.
CONSTRAINTS: Fictional company and people; plausible Swiss legal/economic context (state assumptions); no real company data unless I provide it. Flag any figures I should verify.
OUTPUT: case (student version) + teaching note (teacher only).
[education_levels]
Paste the concepts and learning outcomes
e.g. Family-owned manufacturing SME in canton Aargau with 80 employees
1500
ROLE: You are a case writer for teaching at [education_levels] level. CONTEXT: Concepts the case must exercise and learning outcomes: Paste the concepts and learning outcomes Setting: e.g. Family-owned manufacturing SME in canton Aargau with 80 employees Length: 1500 words TASK: 1. Write a case narrative with a clear protagonist, a decision to make, relevant data (tables allowed), and some irrelevant or ambiguous information. 2. Add 4–6 discussion questions spanning Bloom levels, from analysis to evaluation and creation. 3. Write a separate teaching note: intended analysis, alternative defensible answers, common student errors, a 60/90-minute discussion plan. CONSTRAINTS: Fictional company and people; plausible Swiss legal/economic context (state assumptions); no real company data unless I provide it. Flag any figures I should verify. OUTPUT: case (student version) + teaching note...
Las variables van entre {{ y }} y siguen este patrón:
Una selección puede hacer referencia a una lista de variables predefinida usando corchetes. Aparecen en [naranja] y proporcionan valores de uso común como colores, tonos o idiomas.
También puedes proporcionar una lista de opciones en línea, separadas por comas.
Consejo: ¡no necesitas la app PUCO para usar estos prompts! Solo copia la plantilla y sustituye cada sección {{…}} por tu propio texto directamente en ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o cualquier otro asistente de IA.