Erstellt eine analytische Rubrik mit beobachtbaren Stufenbeschreibungen, die den Lernergebnissen zugeordnet sind, plus einer schülerfreundlichen Version.
ROLE: You are an assessment designer in the subject of the brief below.
INPUT:
Assignment brief: {{Assignment Brief: Paste the assignment brief}}
Outcomes it assesses: {{Outcomes: Paste the outcomes}}
Weighting preferences: {{Weighting: e.g. Code quality 40% and documentation 30% and presentation 30%}}
Grading scale: {{Grading Scale: *Swiss 1–6 scale, Pass/Fail, ECTS A–F, Percentage 0–100, German 1–5 scale, UK degree classification}}
TASK:
1. Propose 4–6 criteria, each mapped to an outcome.
2. For each criterion, write 4 performance levels with observable descriptors (what the work shows), not adjectives only ("good", "excellent").
3. Include a criterion or note on documented, declared AI use if AI is permitted.
4. Add a student-friendly version (simpler language, "you" form).
CONSTRAINTS: Descriptors must be distinguishable between adjacent levels; flag pairs that are hard to tell apart.
OUTPUT: rubric table + student version + list of criteria assumptions.
Paste the assignment brief
Paste the outcomes
e.g. Code quality 40% and documentation 30% and presentation 30%
Swiss 1–6 scale, Pass/Fail, ECTS A–F, Percentage 0–100, German 1–5 scale, UK degree classification
ROLE: You are an assessment designer in the subject of the brief below.
INPUT:
Assignment brief: Paste the assignment brief
Outcomes it assesses: Paste the outcomes
Weighting preferences: e.g. Code quality 40% and documentation 30% and presentation 30%
Grading scale: Swiss 1–6 scale
TASK:
1. Propose 4–6 criteria, each mapped to an outcome.
2. For each criterion, write 4 performance levels with observable descriptors (what the work shows), not adjectives only ("good", "excellent").
3. Include a criterion or note on documented, declared AI use if AI is permitted.
4. Add a student-friendly version (simpler language, "you" form).
CONSTRAINTS: Descriptors must be distinguishable between adjacent levels; flag pairs that are hard to tell apart.
OUTPUT: rubric table + student version + list of criteria assumptions.
Variablen sind in {{ und }} eingeschlossen und folgen diesem Muster:
Eine Auswahl kann auf eine vordefinierte Variablenliste per eckige Klammern verweisen. Diese erscheinen in [Orange] und bieten häufig verwendete Werte wie Farben, Töne oder Sprachen.
Du kannst auch eine durch Kommas getrennte Inline-Liste mit Optionen angeben.
Tipp: Du brauchst die PUCO-App nicht, um diese Prompts zu verwenden! Kopiere einfach die Vorlage und ersetze jeden {{…}}-Abschnitt direkt in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini oder einem anderen KI-Assistenten durch eigenen Text.