Best For
- Starting from a structured, reusable prompt instead of a blank chat.
- Adapting the prompt to your own inputs while keeping the original intent intact.
- Workflows related to Education & Academic.
Assignment Grading Rubric Generator
Fill this promptBuilds a weighted grading rubric with observable criterion-based performance descriptions for a given assignment.
Prompt Template
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: {{Assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Criteria: {{Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation}}
Scale: {{Grading Scale: *Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level}}
Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels.
Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead.
Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent.
After the table add briefly:
- Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them.
- A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
Prompt Guide
How To Use It
- Copy the full prompt template.
- Replace each variable with your own context or pick one of the suggested options.
- Paste the completed prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or another AI assistant.
Variables In This Prompt
Assignment
e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise
Audience
Predefined list
[audiences]
Criteria
e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation
Grading Scale
Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level
Example Starting Point
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise Audience: [audiences] Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation Scale: Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels. Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead. Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent. After the table add briefly: - Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them. - A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
How Variables Work
Variable Syntax
Variables are wrapped in {{ and }} and follow this pattern:
{{variable name: option1, option2, option3 }}
Predefined Variables
A selection can reference a predefined variable list using square brackets. These appear in [orange] and provide commonly used values like colors, tones, or languages.
{{Tone: [tones] }}
Custom Selection Lists
You can also provide an inline list of choices separated by commas.
{{Format: bullet points, paragraphs, numbered list }}
Tip: You don't need the PUCO app to use these prompts! Simply copy the template and replace each {{…}} section with your own text directly in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other AI assistant.