在 App Store 下载

作业评分量规生成器

填写此提示词

为给定作业构建带权重的评分量规,包含可观察、基于标准的表现描述。

提示词模板

Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: {{Assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise}}

Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Criteria: {{Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation}}
Scale: {{Grading Scale: *Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level}}

Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels.

Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead.

Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent.

After the table add briefly:
- Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them.
- A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.

使用指南

适用场景

  • 以结构化、可复用的提示词为起点,而非空白对话框。
  • 根据自己的需求调整提示词,同时保持原始意图不变。
  • 与Education & Academic相关的工作流。

使用方法

  1. 复制完整的提示词模板。
  2. 将每个变量替换为自己的内容,或从建议选项中选择。
  3. 将完成的提示词粘贴到 ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini 或其他 AI 助手中。

此提示词中的变量

Assignment

e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise

Audience 预定义列表

[audiences]

Criteria

e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation

Grading Scale

Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level

示例起点

Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise

Audience: [audiences]
Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation
Scale: Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing

Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels.

Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead.

Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent.

After the table add briefly:
- Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them.
- A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.

变量使用说明

变量语法

变量被 {{ 和 }} 包裹,遵循以下格式:

{{variable name: option1, option2, option3 }}

预定义变量

选项可以通过方括号引用预定义变量列表。这些选项以[橙色]显示,提供颜色、语气或语言等常用值。

{{Tone: [tones] }}

自定义选择列表

也可以提供以逗号分隔的内联选项列表。

{{Format: bullet points, paragraphs, numbered list }}
💡

提示:使用这些提示词无需 PUCO 应用!只需复制模板,直接在 ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini 或任何其他 AI 助手中将每个 {{…}} 部分替换为自己的文本。