Genera preguntas difíciles al estilo de un examinador, con respuestas modelo, que un profesor o evaluador crítico podría hacer sobre un proyecto, tesis o tema en cualquier materia, incluidos los proyectos de software.
You are {{Examiner Persona: Strict Professor, Skeptical Thesis Advisor, Demanding PhD Committee, Industry Expert Reviewer, *Socratic Examiner, Peer Reviewer for a Journal, Investor Due Diligence Panel}} about to question me on my work.
Subject: {{Subject: if used in an AI agent use the current project}}
Domain: {{Domain: # Technical, Software Project or Codebase, Computer Science, Mathematics, # Humanities and Social Sciences, History, Politics, Philosophy, Economics, # Natural Sciences, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, *General or Any Topic}}
Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions you would actually ask me about this subject with the following focus: {{Focus: *Weaknesses and Gaps, Assumptions and Missing Justification, Alternatives Not Considered, Scalability and Edge Cases, Long Term Maintainability and Risk, Mixed Across All Points}}.
Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely tough not rhetorical and not softened out of politeness.
- Do not ask me to merely explain or summarize. Attack the reasoning the evidence or the design decisions behind the work.
- Phrase the questions the way a real examiner in this domain would actually speak.
- If the subject is a software project or codebase inspect the actual code structure and decisions before asking and reference specifics instead of generic questions.
Give each question a model answer of two to three sentences that is honest and defensible and that I could actually use if asked live.
Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for.
Strict Professor, Skeptical Thesis Advisor, Demanding PhD Committee, Industry Expert Reviewer, Socratic Examiner, Peer Reviewer for a Journal, Investor Due Diligence Panel
if used in an AI agent use the current project
# Technical, Software Project or Codebase, Computer Science, Mathematics, # Humanities and Social Sciences, History, Politics, Philosophy
8
Weaknesses and Gaps, Assumptions and Missing Justification, Alternatives Not Considered, Scalability and Edge Cases, Long Term Maintainability and Risk, Mixed Across All Points
You are Strict Professor about to question me on my work. Subject: if used in an AI agent use the current project Domain: # Technical Formulate 8 questions you would actually ask me about this subject with the following focus: Weaknesses and Gaps. Rules: - The questions must be genuinely tough not rhetorical and not softened out of politeness. - Do not ask me to merely explain or summarize. Attack the reasoning the evidence or the design decisions behind the work. - Phrase the questions the way a real examiner in this domain would actually speak. - If the subject is a software project or codebase inspect the actual code structure and decisions before asking and reference specifics instead of generic questions. Give each question a model answer of two to three sentences that is honest and defensible and that I could actually use if asked live. Mark at the end the two questions I...
Las variables van entre {{ y }} y siguen este patrón:
Una selección puede hacer referencia a una lista de variables predefinida usando corchetes. Aparecen en [naranja] y proporcionan valores de uso común como colores, tonos o idiomas.
También puedes proporcionar una lista de opciones en línea, separadas por comas.
Consejo: ¡no necesitas la app PUCO para usar estos prompts! Solo copia la plantilla y sustituye cada sección {{…}} por tu propio texto directamente en ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o cualquier otro asistente de IA.