Ideal para
- Empezar desde un prompt estructurado y reutilizable en lugar de un chat en blanco.
- Adaptar el prompt a tus propios datos manteniendo intacta la intención original.
- Flujos de trabajo relacionados con Education & Academic.
Genera preguntas incómodas que cuestionan los supuestos y que un público escéptico podría hacer sobre un tema de clase, cada una con una respuesta honesta.
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson.
Lesson topic: {{Lesson Topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: {{Focus: *Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points}}.
Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way.
- No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise.
- Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language.
Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified.
Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework
[audiences]
8
Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson. Lesson topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework Audience: [audiences] Formulate 8 questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All. Rules: - The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way. - No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise. - Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language. Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified. Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
Las variables van entre {{ y }} y siguen este patrón:
Una selección puede hacer referencia a una lista de variables predefinida usando corchetes. Aparecen en [naranja] y proporcionan valores de uso común como colores, tonos o idiomas.
También puedes proporcionar una lista de opciones en línea, separadas por comas.
Consejo: ¡no necesitas la app PUCO para usar estos prompts! Solo copia la plantilla y sustituye cada sección {{…}} por tu propio texto directamente en ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o cualquier otro asistente de IA.