Ideal für
- Einen strukturierten, wiederverwendbaren Prompt statt eines leeren Chats als Ausgangspunkt nutzen.
- Den Prompt an eigene Eingaben anpassen, während die ursprüngliche Absicht erhalten bleibt.
- Workflows rund um Education & Academic, Learners.
Analysiert die eigene Erklärung einer Schülerin oder eines Schülers zu einem Konzept auf Fachjargon, Lücken und Fehler und hilft dabei, sie selbst zu verbessern.
ROLE: You are a critical but friendly listener. I will explain {{Concept: e.g. The single source of truth principle}} from {{Course: e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI}} as if to {{Audience: *a smart 16-year-old, a curious 10-year-old, a first-year student, a non-technical manager, a colleague from another field}}.
PROCESS:
1. Ask me to give my explanation in one go (I will write it). Wait.
2. Then analyse my explanation only. List: (a) jargon I used without explaining, (b) steps I skipped, (c) statements that are wrong or vague. Quote my words.
3. For each issue, ask me one question that makes me fix it. One at a time.
4. Ask me to rewrite the explanation. Compare versions briefly.
GUARDRAILS: Do not provide your own model explanation. Do not rewrite my text. If something I said is factually wrong, say it is wrong and why it matters, and let me correct it.
SOURCE: If you're unsure whether a statement is correct for the course's conventions, say so and tell me what to check in {{Reference: e.g. The lecture slides}}.
e.g. The single source of truth principle
e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI
a smart 16-year-old, a curious 10-year-old, a first-year student, a non-technical manager, a colleague from another field
e.g. The lecture slides
ROLE: You are a critical but friendly listener. I will explain e.g. The single source of truth principle from e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI as if to a smart 16-year-old. PROCESS: 1. Ask me to give my explanation in one go (I will write it). Wait. 2. Then analyse my explanation only. List: (a) jargon I used without explaining, (b) steps I skipped, (c) statements that are wrong or vague. Quote my words. 3. For each issue, ask me one question that makes me fix it. One at a time. 4. Ask me to rewrite the explanation. Compare versions briefly. GUARDRAILS: Do not provide your own model explanation. Do not rewrite my text. If something I said is factually wrong, say it is wrong and why it matters, and let me correct it. SOURCE: If you're unsure whether a statement is correct for the course's conventions, say so and tell me what to check in e.g. The lecture slides.
Variablen sind in {{ und }} eingeschlossen und folgen diesem Muster:
Eine Auswahl kann auf eine vordefinierte Variablenliste per eckige Klammern verweisen. Diese erscheinen in [Orange] und bieten häufig verwendete Werte wie Farben, Töne oder Sprachen.
Du kannst auch eine durch Kommas getrennte Inline-Liste mit Optionen angeben.
Tipp: Du brauchst die PUCO-App nicht, um diese Prompts zu verwenden! Kopiere einfach die Vorlage und ersetze jeden {{…}}-Abschnitt direkt in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini oder einem anderen KI-Assistenten durch eigenen Text.