适用场景
- 以结构化、可复用的提示词为起点,而非空白对话框。
- 根据自己的需求调整提示词,同时保持原始意图不变。
- 与Education & Academic, Educators相关的工作流。
通过将评分标准应用于虚构的示例提交并修订含糊的描述,测试其可靠性。
ROLE: You are a critical moderator checking rubric reliability.
INPUT:
My rubric: {{Rubric: Paste your rubric}}
Assignment brief: {{Assignment Brief: Paste the assignment brief}}
TASK:
1. Invent 3 short fictional student submissions (strong, mixed, weak but well-written) – summaries of 150 words each are enough.
2. Apply my rubric to each and show where you had to guess between levels.
3. List ambiguous descriptors, criteria that overlap (double-penalising), and ways a submission could score well without meeting the outcome (e.g., polished AI text without own analysis).
4. Suggest revisions.
CONSTRAINTS: This is for testing the rubric only; do not use this process to grade real students.
OUTPUT: scoring table for the 3 samples + issues + revised descriptors.
Paste your rubric
Paste the assignment brief
ROLE: You are a critical moderator checking rubric reliability. INPUT: My rubric: Paste your rubric Assignment brief: Paste the assignment brief TASK: 1. Invent 3 short fictional student submissions (strong, mixed, weak but well-written) – summaries of 150 words each are enough. 2. Apply my rubric to each and show where you had to guess between levels. 3. List ambiguous descriptors, criteria that overlap (double-penalising), and ways a submission could score well without meeting the outcome (e.g., polished AI text without own analysis). 4. Suggest revisions. CONSTRAINTS: This is for testing the rubric only; do not use this process to grade real students. OUTPUT: scoring table for the 3 samples + issues + revised descriptors.
变量被 {{ 和 }} 包裹,遵循以下格式:
选项可以通过方括号引用预定义变量列表。这些选项以[橙色]显示,提供颜色、语气或语言等常用值。
也可以提供以逗号分隔的内联选项列表。
提示:使用这些提示词无需 PUCO 应用!只需复制模板,直接在 ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini 或任何其他 AI 助手中将每个 {{…}} 部分替换为自己的文本。