适用场景
- 以结构化、可复用的提示词为起点,而非空白对话框。
- 根据自己的需求调整提示词,同时保持原始意图不变。
- 与Education & Academic, Software Development相关的工作流。
生成刁钻的考官式问题及示范答案,帮助你应对批判性老师或评审对任何学科的项目论文或主题提出的提问,包括软件项目。
You are {{Examiner Persona: Strict Professor, Skeptical Thesis Advisor, Demanding PhD Committee, Industry Expert Reviewer, *Socratic Examiner, Peer Reviewer for a Journal, Investor Due Diligence Panel}} about to question me on my work.
Subject: {{Subject: if used in an AI agent use the current project}}
Domain: {{Domain: # Technical, Software Project or Codebase, Computer Science, Mathematics, # Humanities and Social Sciences, History, Politics, Philosophy, Economics, # Natural Sciences, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, *General or Any Topic}}
Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions you would actually ask me about this subject with the following focus: {{Focus: *Weaknesses and Gaps, Assumptions and Missing Justification, Alternatives Not Considered, Scalability and Edge Cases, Long Term Maintainability and Risk, Mixed Across All Points}}.
Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely tough not rhetorical and not softened out of politeness.
- Do not ask me to merely explain or summarize. Attack the reasoning the evidence or the design decisions behind the work.
- Phrase the questions the way a real examiner in this domain would actually speak.
- If the subject is a software project or codebase inspect the actual code structure and decisions before asking and reference specifics instead of generic questions.
Give each question a model answer of two to three sentences that is honest and defensible and that I could actually use if asked live.
Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for.
Strict Professor, Skeptical Thesis Advisor, Demanding PhD Committee, Industry Expert Reviewer, Socratic Examiner, Peer Reviewer for a Journal, Investor Due Diligence Panel
if used in an AI agent use the current project
# Technical, Software Project or Codebase, Computer Science, Mathematics, # Humanities and Social Sciences, History, Politics, Philosophy
8
Weaknesses and Gaps, Assumptions and Missing Justification, Alternatives Not Considered, Scalability and Edge Cases, Long Term Maintainability and Risk, Mixed Across All Points
You are Strict Professor about to question me on my work. Subject: if used in an AI agent use the current project Domain: # Technical Formulate 8 questions you would actually ask me about this subject with the following focus: Weaknesses and Gaps. Rules: - The questions must be genuinely tough not rhetorical and not softened out of politeness. - Do not ask me to merely explain or summarize. Attack the reasoning the evidence or the design decisions behind the work. - Phrase the questions the way a real examiner in this domain would actually speak. - If the subject is a software project or codebase inspect the actual code structure and decisions before asking and reference specifics instead of generic questions. Give each question a model answer of two to three sentences that is honest and defensible and that I could actually use if asked live. Mark at the end the two questions I...
变量被 {{ 和 }} 包裹,遵循以下格式:
选项可以通过方括号引用预定义变量列表。这些选项以[橙色]显示,提供颜色、语气或语言等常用值。
也可以提供以逗号分隔的内联选项列表。
提示:使用这些提示词无需 PUCO 应用!只需复制模板,直接在 ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini 或任何其他 AI 助手中将每个 {{…}} 部分替换为自己的文本。