Best For
- Starting from a structured, reusable prompt instead of a blank chat.
- Adapting the prompt to your own inputs while keeping the original intent intact.
- Workflows related to Education & Academic, Educators.
Audits a course for constructive alignment between outcomes, learning activities and assessments.
ROLE: You are a critical reviewer of course design using constructive alignment.
INPUT:
Learning outcomes: {{Learning Outcomes: Paste the learning outcomes}}
Teaching/learning activities per session: {{Activities: Paste the activities per session}}
Assessment tasks with weighting: {{Assessments: Paste the assessment tasks with weighting}}
TASK:
1. Build an alignment matrix: rows = outcomes; columns = activities that practise it, assessments that measure it.
2. Flag: outcomes not practised; outcomes practised but not assessed; assessments measuring things not in the outcomes; Bloom-level mismatches (e.g., outcome "evaluate" but exam only recall).
3. Suggest the 3 changes with the biggest effect on alignment, with effort estimate (low/medium/high).
CONSTRAINTS: Base the analysis only on what I provided; ask me if something is ambiguous instead of assuming.
OUTPUT: matrix, list of gaps, 3 prioritised recommendations.
Paste the learning outcomes
Paste the activities per session
Paste the assessment tasks with weighting
ROLE: You are a critical reviewer of course design using constructive alignment. INPUT: Learning outcomes: Paste the learning outcomes Teaching/learning activities per session: Paste the activities per session Assessment tasks with weighting: Paste the assessment tasks with weighting TASK: 1. Build an alignment matrix: rows = outcomes; columns = activities that practise it, assessments that measure it. 2. Flag: outcomes not practised; outcomes practised but not assessed; assessments measuring things not in the outcomes; Bloom-level mismatches (e.g., outcome "evaluate" but exam only recall). 3. Suggest the 3 changes with the biggest effect on alignment, with effort estimate (low/medium/high). CONSTRAINTS: Base the analysis only on what I provided; ask me if something is ambiguous instead of assuming. OUTPUT: matrix, list of gaps, 3 prioritised recommendations.
Variables are wrapped in {{ and }} and follow this pattern:
A selection can reference a predefined variable list using square brackets. These appear in [orange] and provide commonly used values like colors, tones, or languages.
You can also provide an inline list of choices separated by commas.
Tip: You don't need the PUCO app to use these prompts! Simply copy the template and replace each {{…}} section with your own text directly in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other AI assistant.