Ideal para
- Empezar desde un prompt estructurado y reutilizable en lugar de un chat en blanco.
- Adaptar el prompt a tus propios datos manteniendo intacta la intención original.
- Flujos de trabajo relacionados con Education & Academic, Learners.
Comprobación Feynman de explicación
Rellenar este promptAnaliza la explicación que un estudiante hace por su cuenta de un concepto para detectar jerga, lagunas y errores, y le guía para que los corrija él mismo.
Plantilla de prompt
ROLE: You are a critical but friendly listener. I will explain {{Concept: e.g. The single source of truth principle}} from {{Course: e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI}} as if to {{Audience: *a smart 16-year-old, a curious 10-year-old, a first-year student, a non-technical manager, a colleague from another field}}.
PROCESS:
1. Ask me to give my explanation in one go (I will write it). Wait.
2. Then analyse my explanation only. List: (a) jargon I used without explaining, (b) steps I skipped, (c) statements that are wrong or vague. Quote my words.
3. For each issue, ask me one question that makes me fix it. One at a time.
4. Ask me to rewrite the explanation. Compare versions briefly.
GUARDRAILS: Do not provide your own model explanation. Do not rewrite my text. If something I said is factually wrong, say it is wrong and why it matters, and let me correct it.
SOURCE: If you're unsure whether a statement is correct for the course's conventions, say so and tell me what to check in {{Reference: e.g. The lecture slides}}.
Guía del prompt
Cómo usarlo
- Copia la plantilla de prompt completa.
- Sustituye cada variable por tu propio contexto o elige una de las opciones sugeridas.
- Pega el prompt completado en ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini u otro asistente de IA.
Variables de este prompt
Concept
e.g. The single source of truth principle
Course
e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI
Audience
a smart 16-year-old, a curious 10-year-old, a first-year student, a non-technical manager, a colleague from another field
Reference
e.g. The lecture slides
Ejemplo de partida
ROLE: You are a critical but friendly listener. I will explain e.g. The single source of truth principle from e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI as if to a smart 16-year-old. PROCESS: 1. Ask me to give my explanation in one go (I will write it). Wait. 2. Then analyse my explanation only. List: (a) jargon I used without explaining, (b) steps I skipped, (c) statements that are wrong or vague. Quote my words. 3. For each issue, ask me one question that makes me fix it. One at a time. 4. Ask me to rewrite the explanation. Compare versions briefly. GUARDRAILS: Do not provide your own model explanation. Do not rewrite my text. If something I said is factually wrong, say it is wrong and why it matters, and let me correct it. SOURCE: If you're unsure whether a statement is correct for the course's conventions, say so and tell me what to check in e.g. The lecture slides.
Cómo funcionan las variables
Sintaxis de variables
Las variables van entre {{ y }} y siguen este patrón:
{{variable name: option1, option2, option3 }}
Variables predefinidas
Una selección puede hacer referencia a una lista de variables predefinida usando corchetes. Aparecen en [naranja] y proporcionan valores de uso común como colores, tonos o idiomas.
{{Tone: [tones] }}
Listas de selección personalizadas
También puedes proporcionar una lista de opciones en línea, separadas por comas.
{{Format: bullet points, paragraphs, numbered list }}
Consejo: ¡no necesitas la app PUCO para usar estos prompts! Solo copia la plantilla y sustituye cada sección {{…}} por tu propio texto directamente en ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o cualquier otro asistente de IA.