Ideal für
- Einen strukturierten, wiederverwendbaren Prompt statt eines leeren Chats als Ausgangspunkt nutzen.
- Den Prompt an eigene Eingaben anpassen, während die ursprüngliche Absicht erhalten bleibt.
- Workflows rund um Education & Academic.
Erzeugt unbequeme, die Grundannahmen angreifende Fragen, die ein skeptisches Publikum zu einem Unterrichtsthema stellen könnte, jeweils mit einer ehrlichen Antwort.
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson.
Lesson topic: {{Lesson Topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: {{Focus: *Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points}}.
Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way.
- No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise.
- Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language.
Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified.
Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework
[audiences]
8
Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson. Lesson topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework Audience: [audiences] Formulate 8 questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All. Rules: - The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way. - No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise. - Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language. Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified. Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
Variablen sind in {{ und }} eingeschlossen und folgen diesem Muster:
Eine Auswahl kann auf eine vordefinierte Variablenliste per eckige Klammern verweisen. Diese erscheinen in [Orange] und bieten häufig verwendete Werte wie Farben, Töne oder Sprachen.
Du kannst auch eine durch Kommas getrennte Inline-Liste mit Optionen angeben.
Tipp: Du brauchst die PUCO-App nicht, um diese Prompts zu verwenden! Kopiere einfach die Vorlage und ersetze jeden {{…}}-Abschnitt direkt in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini oder einem anderen KI-Assistenten durch eigenen Text.