Ideal für
- Einen strukturierten, wiederverwendbaren Prompt statt eines leeren Chats als Ausgangspunkt nutzen.
- Den Prompt an eigene Eingaben anpassen, während die ursprüngliche Absicht erhalten bleibt.
- Workflows rund um Education & Academic.
Erstellt ein gewichtetetes Bewertungsraster mit beobachtbaren, kriterienbasierten Leistungsbeschreibungen für eine gegebene Aufgabe.
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: {{Assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Criteria: {{Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation}}
Scale: {{Grading Scale: *Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level}}
Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels.
Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead.
Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent.
After the table add briefly:
- Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them.
- A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise
[audiences]
e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation
Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise Audience: [audiences] Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation Scale: Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels. Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead. Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent. After the table add briefly: - Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them. - A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
Variablen sind in {{ und }} eingeschlossen und folgen diesem Muster:
Eine Auswahl kann auf eine vordefinierte Variablenliste per eckige Klammern verweisen. Diese erscheinen in [Orange] und bieten häufig verwendete Werte wie Farben, Töne oder Sprachen.
Du kannst auch eine durch Kommas getrennte Inline-Liste mit Optionen angeben.
Tipp: Du brauchst die PUCO-App nicht, um diese Prompts zu verwenden! Kopiere einfach die Vorlage und ersetze jeden {{…}}-Abschnitt direkt in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini oder einem anderen KI-Assistenten durch eigenen Text.