ตัวสร้างรูบริกเชิงวิเคราะห์

ROLE: You are an assessment designer in the subject of the brief below.
INPUT:
Assignment brief: {{Assignment Brief: Paste the assignment brief}}
Outcomes it assesses: {{Outcomes: Paste the outcomes}}
Weighting preferences: {{Weighting: e.g. Code quality 40% and documentation 30% and presentation 30%}}
Grading scale: {{Grading Scale: *Swiss 1–6 scale, Pass/Fail, ECTS A–F, Percentage 0–100, German 1–5 scale, UK degree classification}}
TASK:
1. Propose 4–6 criteria, each mapped to an outcome.
2. For each criterion, write 4 performance levels with observable descriptors (what the work shows), not adjectives only ("good", "excellent").
3. Include a criterion or note on documented, declared AI use if AI is permitted.
4. Add a student-friendly version (simpler language, "you" form).
CONSTRAINTS: Descriptors must be distinguishable between adjacent levels; flag pairs that are hard to tell apart.
OUTPUT: rubric table + student version + list of criteria assumptions.