Ideal para
- Começar a partir de um prompt estruturado e reutilizável em vez de um chat em branco.
- Adaptar o prompt aos seus próprios dados, mantendo intacta a intenção original.
- Fluxos de trabalho relacionados com Education & Academic, Educators.
Analisa com que facilidade a IA poderia concluir uma tarefa e a redesenha para manter os resultados válidos.
ROLE: You are an assessment designer who is realistic about what current AI tools can do.
INPUT:
Current assignment (brief + rubric): {{Assignment and Rubric: Paste the brief and rubric}}
Outcomes: {{Outcomes: Paste the outcomes}}
Lane: {{Lane: *Open (Lane 2), Secure/supervised (Lane 1)}}
AI policy for this task: {{AI Policy: e.g. AI allowed with declaration}}
TASK:
1. Vulnerability analysis: which parts could a student fully complete with a chatbot in under an hour? Be concrete.
2. Propose a redesign that keeps the outcomes, using 2–4 of: personal/local data or context (e.g., their own workplace, a site visit), process artefacts (drafts, decision logs, AI-use log), in-class components, short oral defence, critique of an AI-generated output, staged submissions with feedback.
3. Estimate the extra workload for students and for me.
4. Note what remains unverifiable and should be tested in a secure (lane 1) assessment instead.
CONSTRAINTS: Don't rely on AI detectors. Don't propose making tasks "trickier" without improving validity.
OUTPUT: vulnerability table, redesigned brief, workload estimate.
Paste the brief and rubric
Paste the outcomes
Open (Lane 2), Secure/supervised (Lane 1)
e.g. AI allowed with declaration
ROLE: You are an assessment designer who is realistic about what current AI tools can do. INPUT: Current assignment (brief + rubric): Paste the brief and rubric Outcomes: Paste the outcomes Lane: Open (Lane 2) AI policy for this task: e.g. AI allowed with declaration TASK: 1. Vulnerability analysis: which parts could a student fully complete with a chatbot in under an hour? Be concrete. 2. Propose a redesign that keeps the outcomes, using 2–4 of: personal/local data or context (e.g., their own workplace, a site visit), process artefacts (drafts, decision logs, AI-use log), in-class components, short oral defence, critique of an AI-generated output, staged submissions with feedback. 3. Estimate the extra workload for students and for me. 4. Note what remains unverifiable and should be tested in a secure (lane 1) assessment instead. CONSTRAINTS: Don't rely on AI detectors. Don't propose...
As variáveis ficam entre {{ e }} e seguem este padrão:
Uma seleção pode fazer referência a uma lista de variáveis predefinida usando colchetes. Aparecem em [laranja] e fornecem valores comuns, como cores, tons ou idiomas.
Também pode fornecer uma lista de opções em linha, separadas por vírgulas.
Dica: não precisa da app PUCO para usar estes prompts! Basta copiar o modelo e substituir cada secção {{…}} pelo seu próprio texto diretamente no ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini ou qualquer outro assistente de IA.