Ideale per
- Partire da un prompt strutturato e riutilizzabile invece di una chat vuota.
- Adattare il prompt ai propri input mantenendo intatto l'intento originale.
- Flussi di lavoro legati a Education & Academic, Software Development.
Genera domande difficili in stile esaminatore con risposte modello che un docente o revisore critico potrebbe porre su un progetto, una tesi o un argomento in qualsiasi disciplina, inclusi i progetti software.
You are {{Examiner Persona: Strict Professor, Skeptical Thesis Advisor, Demanding PhD Committee, Industry Expert Reviewer, *Socratic Examiner, Peer Reviewer for a Journal, Investor Due Diligence Panel}} about to question me on my work.
Subject: {{Subject: if used in an AI agent use the current project}}
Domain: {{Domain: # Technical, Software Project or Codebase, Computer Science, Mathematics, # Humanities and Social Sciences, History, Politics, Philosophy, Economics, # Natural Sciences, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, *General or Any Topic}}
Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions you would actually ask me about this subject with the following focus: {{Focus: *Weaknesses and Gaps, Assumptions and Missing Justification, Alternatives Not Considered, Scalability and Edge Cases, Long Term Maintainability and Risk, Mixed Across All Points}}.
Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely tough not rhetorical and not softened out of politeness.
- Do not ask me to merely explain or summarize. Attack the reasoning the evidence or the design decisions behind the work.
- Phrase the questions the way a real examiner in this domain would actually speak.
- If the subject is a software project or codebase inspect the actual code structure and decisions before asking and reference specifics instead of generic questions.
Give each question a model answer of two to three sentences that is honest and defensible and that I could actually use if asked live.
Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for.
Strict Professor, Skeptical Thesis Advisor, Demanding PhD Committee, Industry Expert Reviewer, Socratic Examiner, Peer Reviewer for a Journal, Investor Due Diligence Panel
if used in an AI agent use the current project
# Technical, Software Project or Codebase, Computer Science, Mathematics, # Humanities and Social Sciences, History, Politics, Philosophy
8
Weaknesses and Gaps, Assumptions and Missing Justification, Alternatives Not Considered, Scalability and Edge Cases, Long Term Maintainability and Risk, Mixed Across All Points
You are Strict Professor about to question me on my work. Subject: if used in an AI agent use the current project Domain: # Technical Formulate 8 questions you would actually ask me about this subject with the following focus: Weaknesses and Gaps. Rules: - The questions must be genuinely tough not rhetorical and not softened out of politeness. - Do not ask me to merely explain or summarize. Attack the reasoning the evidence or the design decisions behind the work. - Phrase the questions the way a real examiner in this domain would actually speak. - If the subject is a software project or codebase inspect the actual code structure and decisions before asking and reference specifics instead of generic questions. Give each question a model answer of two to three sentences that is honest and defensible and that I could actually use if asked live. Mark at the end the two questions I...
Le variabili sono racchiuse tra {{ e }} e seguono questo schema:
Una selezione può fare riferimento a un elenco di variabili predefinito usando le parentesi quadre. Appaiono in [arancione] e forniscono valori di uso comune come colori, toni o lingue.
Puoi anche fornire un elenco di scelte in linea, separate da virgole.
Suggerimento: non hai bisogno dell'app PUCO per usare questi prompt! Copia semplicemente il modello e sostituisci ogni sezione {{…}} con il tuo testo direttamente in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o qualsiasi altro assistente IA.