Ideale per
- Partire da un prompt strutturato e riutilizzabile invece di una chat vuota.
- Adattare il prompt ai propri input mantenendo intatto l'intento originale.
- Flussi di lavoro legati a Education & Academic.
Genera domande scomode che mettono in discussione le premesse e che un pubblico scettico potrebbe porre su un argomento di lezione, con una risposta onesta per ciascuna.
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson.
Lesson topic: {{Lesson Topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: {{Focus: *Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points}}.
Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way.
- No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise.
- Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language.
Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified.
Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework
[audiences]
8
Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson. Lesson topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework Audience: [audiences] Formulate 8 questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All. Rules: - The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way. - No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise. - Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language. Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified. Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
Le variabili sono racchiuse tra {{ e }} e seguono questo schema:
Una selezione può fare riferimento a un elenco di variabili predefinito usando le parentesi quadre. Appaiono in [arancione] e forniscono valori di uso comune come colori, toni o lingue.
Puoi anche fornire un elenco di scelte in linea, separate da virgole.
Suggerimento: non hai bisogno dell'app PUCO per usare questi prompt! Copia semplicemente il modello e sostituisci ogni sezione {{…}} con il tuo testo direttamente in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o qualsiasi altro assistente IA.