Idéal pour
- Partir d'un prompt structuré et réutilisable plutôt que d'une conversation vierge.
- Adapter le prompt à vos propres données tout en conservant l'intention d'origine.
- Les workflows liés à Education & Academic, Educators.
Analyse les objectifs d’apprentissage existants d’un cours et propose un ensemble révisé, évaluable et associé au niveau de Bloom.
ROLE: You are an educational developer specialising in the education level and field of the course below.
CONTEXT:
Course: {{Course Details: e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI – 3 ECTS – 14 sessions of 90 minutes}}
Level: {{Level:[education_levels]}}
Existing outcomes (if any): {{Existing Outcomes: Paste existing outcomes or type none}}
Professional context graduates work in: {{Professional Context: e.g. App developers in Swiss agencies and SMEs}}
TASK:
1. Critique each existing outcome: is the verb observable? Is the Bloom level appropriate for the level? Is it assessable within the course? Is it actually 2 outcomes?
2. Propose a revised set of 4–7 outcomes in the form "By the end, students will be able to [verb] [content] [condition/standard]". Tag each with Bloom level and knowledge type (factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive).
3. Flag any outcome that AI tools could easily satisfy on the student's behalf in an unsupervised task, and suggest how its assessment should differ.
CONSTRAINTS: Avoid "understand", "know", "be familiar with". Don't exceed 7 outcomes.
OUTPUT: table (original | issue | revised outcome | Bloom level | assessment idea).
e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI – 3 ECTS – 14 sessions of 90 minutes
[education_levels]
Paste existing outcomes or type none
e.g. App developers in Swiss agencies and SMEs
ROLE: You are an educational developer specialising in the education level and field of the course below. CONTEXT: Course: e.g. Mobile App Development with SwiftUI – 3 ECTS – 14 sessions of 90 minutes Level: [education_levels] Existing outcomes (if any): Paste existing outcomes or type none Professional context graduates work in: e.g. App developers in Swiss agencies and SMEs TASK: 1. Critique each existing outcome: is the verb observable? Is the Bloom level appropriate for the level? Is it assessable within the course? Is it actually 2 outcomes? 2. Propose a revised set of 4–7 outcomes in the form "By the end, students will be able to [verb] [content] [condition/standard]". Tag each with Bloom level and knowledge type (factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive). 3. Flag any outcome that AI tools could easily satisfy on the student's behalf in an unsupervised task, and suggest how...
Les variables sont entourées de {{ et }} et suivent ce modèle :
Une sélection peut référencer une liste de variables prédéfinie à l'aide de crochets. Elles apparaissent en [orange] et fournissent des valeurs courantes comme des couleurs, des tons ou des langues.
Vous pouvez aussi fournir une liste de choix en ligne, séparés par des virgules.
Astuce : vous n'avez pas besoin de l'application PUCO pour utiliser ces prompts ! Copiez simplement le modèle et remplacez chaque section {{…}} par votre propre texte directement dans ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini ou tout autre assistant IA.